SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021;51(4):685-691.

Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting.

, , , , , ,

제1저자 최슬기, 강병주 · 교신저자 이은영

소속 (6)
  1. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  2. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.
  4. Genome Insight Inc., Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
  5. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  6. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: elee@snu.ac.kr.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To determine the association of first, second, and third-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

METHODS The study population was composed of 8,018 seropositive RA patients who were prescribed bDMARDs or tofacitinib between January 2014 and January 2019 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. First, second, and third-line choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, as well as non-TNFi including tocilizumab, rituximab, tofacitinib, and abatacept were assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for drug failure according to bDMARD or tofacitinib choice starting from the initial prescription date.

RESULTS Compared to first etanercept users, patients with first tocilizumab (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46-0.68), tofacitinib (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18-0.42), or abatacept (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69-0.99) had lower risk of drug failure. Second choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25-0.55), tofacitinib (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15-0.37), or abatacept (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.84) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to second etanercept users. Finally, third choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.62) or tofacitinib (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.63) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to third TNFi users.

CONCLUSION First and second-line tocilizumab, tofacitinib, or abatacept may lead to improved drug survival. Third-line use of tocilizumab or tofacitinib may be beneficiary in reducing drug failure risk among seropositive RA patients.

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugsDrug survivalRheumatoid arthritis

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
저널
Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · eISSN 1532-866X
전자 출판
2021-06-07
MeSH
Abatacept / therapeutic use · Antirheumatic Agents* / therapeutic use · Arthritis, Rheumatoid* / drug therapy · Cohort Studies · Humans · Pharmaceutical Preparations*
Substances
Antirheumatic Agents · Pharmaceutical Preparations · Abatacept