SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(3):501-8.

p21-Activated Kinase 4 (PAK4) as a Predictive Marker of Gemcitabine Sensitivity in Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines.

, , , , , , , , , , ,

제1저자 문승욱 · 교신저자 김진원

소속 (2)
  1. Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
  2. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE p21-activated kinases (PAKs) are involved in cytoskeletal reorganization, gene transcription, cell proliferation and survival, and oncogenic transformation. Therefore, we hypothesized that PAK expression levels could predict the sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine treatment, and PAKs could be therapeutic targets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Cell viability inhibition by gemcitabine was evaluated in human pancreatic cancer cell lines (Capan-1, Capan-2, MIA PaCa-2, PANC-1, Aspc-1, SNU-213, and SNU-410). Protein expression and mRNA of molecules was detected by immunoblot analysis and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. To define the function of PAK4, PAK4 was controlled using PAK4 siRNA.

RESULTS Capan-2, PANC-1, and SNU-410 cells were resistant to gemcitabine treatment. Immunoblot analysis of signaling molecules reported to indicate gemcitabine sensitivity showed higher expression of PAK4 and lower expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1), a well-known predictive marker for gemcitabine activity, in the resistant cell lines. Knockdown of PAK4 using siRNA induced the upregulation of hENT1. In resistant cell lines (Capan-2, PANC-1, and SNU-410), knockdown of PAK4 by siRNA resulted in restoration of sensitivity to gemcitabine.

CONCLUSION PAK4 could be a predictive marker of gemcitabine sensitivity and a potential therapeutic target to increase gemcitabine sensitivity in pancreatic cancer.

Keywords

GemcitabinePAK4Pancreatic neoplasmshENT1

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. The cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine on human pancreatic cancer cell lines. The cell viability of three pancreatic cancer cell lines (Capan-2, PANC-1, and SNU-410) reflected increased resistance to gemcitabine, whereas the other cancer cell lines (Capan-1, MIA PaCa-2, Aspc-1, and SNU-213) showed relatively good sensitivity to gemcitabine.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Protein expression of p21-activated kinases (PAKs) and signaling molecules related to gemcitabine sensitivity. An inverse relationship was observed between PAK4 and human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) protein expression. (A) In gemcitabine-resistant cell lines (Capan-2, PANC-1, and SNU-410), higher PAK4 and lower hENT1 protein expression are shown. (B) There is no correlation between molecules of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway (EGFR, p-EGFR, AKT, p-AKT, ERK, and p-ERK) and sensitivity to gemcitabine. The quantitative graph of densitometry (C) shows a significant correlation between PAK4 and hENT1 expression in pancreatic cancer cell lines.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. The effect of p21-activated kinase 4 (PAK4) knockdown on human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) expression in pancreatic cancer cell lines with higher PAK4 expression. PAK4 knockdown induced higher hENT1 protein expression in pancreatic cancer cell lines (Capan-2, PANC-1, and SNU-410). mRNA levels of hENT1 were also upregulated when PAK4 was knocked down in the pancreatic cancer cell lines.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. The effect of p21-activated kinase 4 (PAK4) expression on sensitivity to gemcitabine. Treatment with siRNA reduced PAK4 expression in Capan-2 (A), PANC-1 (B), SNU-410 (C), and MIA PaCa-2 cell lines (D). Pancreatic cell lines with PAK4 knockdown had decreased cell viability when compared to those with higher PAK4 expression (Capan-2, PANC-1, and SNU-410). When gemcitabine was added in combination with PAK4 knockdown, cell viability was significantly reduced compared to that of cell lines with high-level PAK4 expression treated with gemcitabine alone. MIA PaCa-2 cells, which have lower PAK4 expression, were used as a negative control. Although PAK4 siRNA alone did not induce a significant reduction in cell viability, the combination of PAK4 knockdown with gemcitabine showed a modest effect. Results are expressed as mean±SE (*p < 0.001). GEM, gemcitabine.

그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC4506111)

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article
저널
Cancer research and treatment · ISSN 1598-2998
전자 출판
2014-11-24
참고문헌
24편