Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(8):1072-1081.
Intensive care unit length of stay is reduced by protocolized family support intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
제1저자 이현우, 박현경 · 교신저자 이연주
소속 (4)
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Portland, USA.
- Department of Information Statistics, Andong National University, Andong, South Korea.
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, 13620, South Korea. yjlee1117@snubh.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to elucidate the impact of protocolized family support intervention on length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other web-based databases were referenced since inception until November 26, 2018. We included randomized-controlled trials wherein protocolized family support interventions were conducted for enhanced communication and shared medical decision-making. LOS (in days) and mortality were evaluated using a random-effects model, and adjusted LOS was estimated using a mixed-effects model.
RESULTS We included seven randomized-controlled trials with 3477 patients. Protocolized family support interventions were found to significantly reduce the ICU LOS {mean difference = - 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) = - 1.50 to - 0.27]} and hospital LOS [mean difference = - 3.78 (95% CI = - 5.26 to - 2.29)]; the results of the mixed-effect model showed that they significantly reduced ICU LOS after adjusting for the therapeutic goal [mean difference = - 1.30 (95% CI = - 2.35 to - 0.26)], methods of measurement [mean difference = - 0.89 (95% CI = - 1.55 to - 0.22)], and timing of intervention [mean difference = - 1.05 (95% CI = - 2.05 to - 0.05)]. Similar results were found after adjusting for patients' disease severity [mean difference = - 1.21 (95% CI = - 2.03 to - 0.39)] and the trim-and-fill method [mean difference = - 0.86 (95% CI = - 1.44 to - 0.28)]. There was no difference in mortality rate in ICU and hospital between the protocolized intervention and control groups.
CONCLUSIONS Protocolized family support intervention for enhanced communication and shared decision-making with the family reduced ICU LOS in critically ill patients without impacting mortality.
Keywords
Critical careDecision support techniquesDecision-makingIntensive care unitsProfessional-family relations
Comment · 정정
그 밖의 정보
- 출판 형태
- Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review
- 저널
- Intensive care medicine · eISSN 1432-1238
- 전자 출판
- 2019-07-03
- MeSH
- Clinical Protocols / standards · Family / psychology · Humans · Intensive Care Units / organization & administration / trends · Length of Stay / trends · Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / statistics & numerical data · Social Support*
- 참고문헌
- 44편