SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

Int J Infect Dis. 2016;44:4-7.

Differences in characteristics between first and breakthrough neutropenic fever after chemotherapy in patients with hematologic disease.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

제1저자 남은영 · 교신저자 송경호

소속 (4)
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro 173 beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 463-707, Korea.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro 173 beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 463-707, Korea; Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address: khsongmd@gmail.com.
  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro 173 beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 463-707, Korea; Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  4. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to compare the clinical and microbiological characteristics of first and breakthrough neutropenic fever in hematologic malignancy patients after chemotherapy.

METHODS Breakthrough neutropenic fever was any episode of fever, not present initially, that developed either during antibiotic therapy or within 1 week of discontinuation of therapy. A total of 687 neutropenic fever episodes in 241 patients were observed from April 2003 to March 2014.

RESULTS Blood cultures revealed 210 causative microorganisms: 199 (94.8%) were bacteria and 11 (5.2%) were fungi. Gram-negative bacteria predominated in both types of neutropenic episode (first 75% (120/160) vs. breakthrough 56% (18/32)) and the most common pathogen was Escherichia coli. Antibiotic resistance rates were higher in breakthrough episodes than first episodes (piperacillin/tazobactam 6% vs. 31%, p=0.006; ceftazidime 9% vs. 31%, p=0.025). Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment was also more frequent (0% vs. 19%, p=0.001), as was the 30-day mortality rate (4.3% (19/442) vs. 7.9% (19/245), p=0.058), although the latter effect was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION It is concluded that the epidemiological profile of breakthrough neutropenic fever is different from that of first episode fever. These data reinforce the view that pooled reporting of neutropenic fever may be misleading, and that clinicians should approach breakthrough fever as a distinct entity.

Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Breakthrough infectionsFebrile neutropeniaHematologic malignancy

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article
저널
International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · eISSN 1878-3511
전자 출판
2016-01-15
MeSH
Adult · Aged · Antineoplastic Agents / adverse effects / therapeutic use · Ceftazidime / therapeutic use · Drug Resistance, Microbial · Female · Fever / etiology · Fungi · Gram-Negative Bacteria · Hematologic Neoplasms / complications / drug therapy · Humans · Male · Middle Aged · Neutropenia / epidemiology / etiology / microbiology · Penicillanic Acid / therapeutic use · Piperacillin / therapeutic use
Substances
Antineoplastic Agents · Penicillanic Acid · Ceftazidime · Piperacillin