SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

Am J Clin Oncol. 2020;43(9):654-659.

Comparison of FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel for Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Using Korean Pancreatic Cancer (K-PaC) Registry.

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

제1저자 이종찬, 우상명 · 교신저자 황진혁

소속 (3)
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam.
  2. Center for Liver Cancer.
  3. Cancer Big Data Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi Province, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE By using the Korean Pancreatic Cancer (K-PaC) registry, we compared the clinical outcomes of FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GNP) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC).

METHODS We constructed a web-based database of 3748 anonymized patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. MPC patients who received first-line FFX or GNP were enrolled. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, grade III to IV toxicity, and cross-over treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS A total of 413 patients (232 vs. 181, FFX vs. GNP; all data are presented in this sequence) were eligible. Median age was 63 years (60 vs. 69 y) with 43% (39% vs. 47%) comprising female individuals. The major metastatic sites were the liver (64%), peritoneum (25%), and distant lymph nodes (18%). The median OS was 11.5 versus 12.7 months (hazard ratio [HR]=0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-1.12, P=0.286), and median progression-free survival was 7.5 versus 8.1 months (HR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.70-1.20, P=0.517), respectively. The frequency of grade III to IV febrile neutropenia was higher in the FFX group (18% vs. 11%, P=0.040), and that of peripheral neuropathy was higher in the GNP group (8% vs. 14%, P=0.046). The chance to receive second-line chemotherapy was higher in the GNP group (45% vs. 56%, P=0.036). In the cross-over treatment, the median OS of the FFX-GNP group (n=43) and the GNP-FFX group (n=47) was 16.8 versus 17.7 months (HR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.44-1.41, P=0.425).

CONCLUSIONS FFX and GNP showed similar efficacy and comparable toxicity in MPC patients. Although the GNP group had a higher chance to receive second-line chemotherapy, they did not have improved overall survival.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
저널
American journal of clinical oncology · eISSN 1537-453X
MeSH
Aged · Albumins / administration & dosage · Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects / therapeutic use · Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal / drug therapy / secondary · Cross-Over Studies · Deoxycytidine / administration & dosage / analogs & derivatives · Febrile Neutropenia / chemically induced · Female · Fluorouracil / adverse effects / therapeutic use · Humans · Irinotecan / adverse effects / therapeutic use · Leucovorin / adverse effects / therapeutic use · Liver Neoplasms / secondary · Lymphatic Metastasis · Male · Middle Aged · Oxaliplatin / adverse effects / therapeutic use · Paclitaxel / administration & dosage · Pancreatic Neoplasms / drug therapy / pathology · Peripheral Nervous System Diseases / chemically induced · Peritoneal Neoplasms / secondary · Progression-Free Survival · Registries · Republic of Korea · Survival Rate · Treatment Outcome · Gemcitabine
Substances
130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxel · Albumins · folfirinox · Oxaliplatin · Deoxycytidine · Irinotecan · Paclitaxel · Leucovorin · Fluorouracil · Gemcitabine
참고문헌
20편