Am J Clin Oncol. 2020;43(9):654-659.
Comparison of FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel for Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Using Korean Pancreatic Cancer (K-PaC) Registry.
제1저자 이종찬, 우상명 · 교신저자 황진혁
소속 (3)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam.
- Center for Liver Cancer.
- Cancer Big Data Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi Province, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE By using the Korean Pancreatic Cancer (K-PaC) registry, we compared the clinical outcomes of FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GNP) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC).
METHODS We constructed a web-based database of 3748 anonymized patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. MPC patients who received first-line FFX or GNP were enrolled. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, grade III to IV toxicity, and cross-over treatment were analyzed.
RESULTS A total of 413 patients (232 vs. 181, FFX vs. GNP; all data are presented in this sequence) were eligible. Median age was 63 years (60 vs. 69 y) with 43% (39% vs. 47%) comprising female individuals. The major metastatic sites were the liver (64%), peritoneum (25%), and distant lymph nodes (18%). The median OS was 11.5 versus 12.7 months (hazard ratio [HR]=0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-1.12, P=0.286), and median progression-free survival was 7.5 versus 8.1 months (HR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.70-1.20, P=0.517), respectively. The frequency of grade III to IV febrile neutropenia was higher in the FFX group (18% vs. 11%, P=0.040), and that of peripheral neuropathy was higher in the GNP group (8% vs. 14%, P=0.046). The chance to receive second-line chemotherapy was higher in the GNP group (45% vs. 56%, P=0.036). In the cross-over treatment, the median OS of the FFX-GNP group (n=43) and the GNP-FFX group (n=47) was 16.8 versus 17.7 months (HR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.44-1.41, P=0.425).
CONCLUSIONS FFX and GNP showed similar efficacy and comparable toxicity in MPC patients. Although the GNP group had a higher chance to receive second-line chemotherapy, they did not have improved overall survival.
그 밖의 정보
- 출판 형태
- Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- 저널
- American journal of clinical oncology · eISSN 1537-453X
- MeSH
- Aged · Albumins / administration & dosage · Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects / therapeutic use · Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal / drug therapy / secondary · Cross-Over Studies · Deoxycytidine / administration & dosage / analogs & derivatives · Febrile Neutropenia / chemically induced · Female · Fluorouracil / adverse effects / therapeutic use · Humans · Irinotecan / adverse effects / therapeutic use · Leucovorin / adverse effects / therapeutic use · Liver Neoplasms / secondary · Lymphatic Metastasis · Male · Middle Aged · Oxaliplatin / adverse effects / therapeutic use · Paclitaxel / administration & dosage · Pancreatic Neoplasms / drug therapy / pathology · Peripheral Nervous System Diseases / chemically induced · Peritoneal Neoplasms / secondary · Progression-Free Survival · Registries · Republic of Korea · Survival Rate · Treatment Outcome · Gemcitabine
- Substances
- 130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxel · Albumins · folfirinox · Oxaliplatin · Deoxycytidine · Irinotecan · Paclitaxel · Leucovorin · Fluorouracil · Gemcitabine
- 참고문헌
- 20편