SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

J Hypertens. 2021;39(2):325-332.

Effect of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring guided antihypertensive treatment on renal progression in patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized comparative study.

, , , , , , , , , ,

제1저자 김윤미 · 교신저자 오국환

소속 (7)
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan.
  2. Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine.
  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University.
  4. Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Kidney Disease Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine.
  5. Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul.
  6. Truewords Dialysis Clinic, Incheon.
  7. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Adequate blood pressure (BP) control is pivotal for managing chronic kidney disease (CKD). The optimal approach for monitoring BP to delay CKD progression is not yet clear.

METHODS Patients with hypertension and CKD stage 3-4 were randomized into ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) or office BP groups. All patients had ABPM at baseline and 18 months, and the ABPM group additionally underwent ABPM at 3 and 6 months. Each ABPM result was notified only for the ABPM group. The BP target was daytime ABP less than 135/85 mmHg for the ABPM group and office BP less than 140/90 mmHg for the office BP group. The primary outcome was decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during 18 months.

RESULTS A total of 146 patients were randomized into the ABPM (n = 69) and office BP groups (n = 77). Although office BP was comparable in the two groups at baseline, daytime ABP was higher in the ABPM group (median 140 vs. 132 mmHg). Initial eGFR was 35.7 ± 12.5 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the ABPM group and 34.6 ± 12.0 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the office BP group. eGFR change was -5.5 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -7.7 to -3.4] ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the ABPM group and -5.0 (95% CI -6.9 to -3.0) ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the office BP group (P = 0.704). Renal events occurred in 10 patients (15.6%) from the ABPM group and five (7.1%) from the office BP group (P = 0.120).

CONCLUSION The present study did not show a beneficial effect of ABPM for controlling hypertension in CKD compared with conventional office BP monitoring in terms of renal outcomes.

Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
저널
Journal of hypertension · eISSN 1473-5598
MeSH
Antihypertensive Agents / therapeutic use · Blood Pressure · Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory · Humans · Hypertension* / complications / drug therapy · Renal Insufficiency, Chronic* / complications / drug therapy
Substances
Antihypertensive Agents
데이터
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02417571
참고문헌
31편