SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

J Korean Med Sci. 2023;38(24):e186.

Predictive Value of Electromechanical Window for Risk of Fatal Ventricular Arrhythmia.

, , , , ,

제1저자 이태민 · 교신저자 오세일

소속 (2)
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. seil@snu.ac.kr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND As an indicator of electro-mechanical coupling, electromechanical window (EMW) can be used to predict fatal ventricular arrhythmias. We investigated the additive effect of EMW on the prediction of fatal ventricular arrhythmias in high-risk patients.

METHODS We included patients who had implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implanted for primary or secondary prevention. The event group was defined as those who received an appropriate ICD therapy. We acquired echocardiograms at ICD implantation and follow-up. The EMW was calculated as the difference between the interval from QRS onset to aortic valve closure and QT interval from the electrocardiogram embedded in the continuous wave doppler image. We evaluated the predictive value of EMW for predicting fatal ventricular arrhythmia.

RESULTS Of 245 patients (67.2 ± 12.8 years, 63.7% men), the event group was 20.0%. EMW at baseline (EMW-Baseline) and follow-up (EMW-FU) was significantly different between event and control groups. After adjustment, both EMW-Baseline (odds ratio [OR]adjust 1.02 [1.01-1.03], P = 0.004) and EMW-FU (ORadjust 1.06 [1.04-1.07], P < 0.001) remained as significant predictors for fatal arrhythmic events. Adding EMW-Baseline significantly improved the discriminating ability of the multivariable model including clinical variables (area under the curve [AUC] 0.77 [0.70-0.84] vs. AUC 0.72 [0.64-0.80], P = 0.004), while a univariable model using EMW-FU alone showed the best performance among models (AUC 0.87 [0.81-0.94], P = 0.060 against model with clinical variables; P = 0.030 against model with clinical variables and EMW-Baseline).

CONCLUSION The EMW could effectively predict severe ventricular arrhythmia in ICD implanted patients. This finding supports the importance of incorporating the electro-mechanical coupling index into the clinical practice for predicting future fatal arrhythmia events.

© 2023 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.

Keywords

EchocardiographyElectromechanical WindowImplantable Cardioverter-DefibrillatorSudden Cardiac DeathVentricular Arrhythmia

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Representative cases with measurements of EMW. Representative figures of measuring EMW in (A) case with fatal arrhythmic event and (B) case without fatal arrhythmic event are presented. QAoC = time interval between the onset of QRS complex and aortic valve closure, EMW = electromechanical window, ms = millisecond.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Violin plot of EMW at baseline and follow-up according to the occurrence of fatal arrhythmic event. Violin plots presenting distribution of (A) EMW at baseline, and (B) EMW at follow-up according to the occurrence of fatal arrhythmic event are shown. EMW = electromechanical window, ms = millisecond.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Scatter plot presenting correlation between QTc and EMW according to the occurrence of fatal arrhythmic event. Scatter plots of QTc and EMW (A) at baseline and (B) at follow-up are presented. EMW = electromechanical window, QTc = corrected QT interval, ms = millisecond.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Comparison of models including EMW versus clinical variables for predicting fatal arrhythmic event. ROC curves of predictive models for fatal arrhythmic event are shown. EMW = electromechanical window, FU = follow-up, AUC = area under the curve, ROC = receiver operation characteristic, CI = confidence interval. aIncluded secondary prevention, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, primary electrical disorder, use of class III AED at baseline, left ventricular ejection fraction, and atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter at baseline.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Best cutoff value of EMW. The adjusted probability with 95% CI of event and the density plot of EMW-FU are presented. The best cutoff value of EMW-FU was calculated from the multivariable logistic regression model using the method by Liu et al. CI = confidence interval, EMW = electromechanical window, FU = follow-up, ms = millisecond.

그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC10279514)

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article
저널
Journal of Korean medical science · eISSN 1598-6357
전자 출판
2023-06-19
MeSH
Male · Humans · Female · Arrhythmias, Cardiac* / diagnosis · Electrocardiography · Echocardiography · Defibrillators, Implantable* · Death, Sudden, Cardiac / etiology / prevention & control · Risk Factors
참고문헌
22편