J Korean Med Sci. 2022;37(29):e238.
Clinical Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Requiring Oxygen Therapy.
제1저자 박도현 · 교신저자 최평균
소속 (2)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. draver@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
Despite the low prevalence of secondary bacterial infection in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, most of them were administered antibiotic therapy empirically. However, the prognostic impact of empirical antibiotic therapy has not been evaluated. We conducted retrospective propensity score-matched case-control study of 233 COVID-19 patients with moderate to severe illnesses who required oxygen therapy and evaluated whether empirical antibiotic therapy could improve clinical outcomes. Empirical antibiotic therapy did not improve clinical outcomes including length of stay, days with oxygen requirement, the proportion of patients with increased oxygen demand, the proportion of patients who required mechanical ventilation, and overall mortality. This finding implies that routine administration of antibiotics for the treatment of COVID-19 is not essential and should be restricted.
© 2022 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.
Keywords
AntibioticsAntimicrobial StewardshipCoronavirus Disease 2019
Comment · 정정
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
그 밖의 정보
- 출판 형태
- Journal Article
- 저널
- Journal of Korean medical science · eISSN 1598-6357
- 전자 출판
- 2022-07-25
- MeSH
- Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use · COVID-19* · Case-Control Studies · Humans · Oxygen / therapeutic use · Retrospective Studies
- Substances
- Anti-Bacterial Agents · Oxygen
- 연구비
- National Research Foundation of Korea 2021M3A9I2080498
- 참고문헌
- 13편