SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e46098.

Three-Day Monitoring of Adhesive Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Patch for Premature Ventricular Complex: Prospective Study for Diagnosis Validation and Evaluation of Burden Fluctuation.

, , , , , ,

제1저자 안효정 · 교신저자 최의근

소속 (3)
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  3. Seers Technology Co, Ltd, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring devices are used worldwide. However, data on the diagnostic yield of an adhesive single-lead ECG patch (SEP) to detect premature ventricular complex (PVC) and the optimal duration of wearing an SEP for PVC burden assessment are limited.

OBJECTIVE We aimed to validate the diagnostic yield of an SEP (mobiCARE MC-100, Seers Technology) for PVC detection and evaluate the PVC burden variation recorded by the SEP over a 3-day monitoring period.

METHODS This is a prospective study of patients with documented PVC on a 12-lead ECG. Patients underwent simultaneous ECG monitoring with the 24-hour Holter monitor and SEP on the first day. On the subsequent second and third days, ECG monitoring was continued using only SEP, and a 3-day extended monitoring was completed. The diagnostic yield of SEP for PVC detection was evaluated by comparison with the results obtained on the first day of Holter monitoring. The PVC burden monitored by SEP for 3 days was used to assess the daily and 6-hour PVC burden variations. The number of patients additionally identified to reach PVC thresholds of 10%, 15%, and 20% during the 3-day extended monitoring by SEP and the clinical factors associated with the higher PVC burden variations were explored.

RESULTS The recruited data of 134 monitored patients (mean age, 54.6 years; males, 45/134, 33.6%) were analyzed. The median daily PVC burden of these patients was 2.4% (IQR 0.2%-10.9%), as measured by the Holter monitor, and 3.3% (IQR 0.3%-11.7%), as measured in the 3-day monitoring by SEP. The daily PVC burden detected on the first day of SEP was in agreement with that of the Holter monitor: the mean difference was -0.07%, with 95% limits of agreement of -1.44% to 1.30%. A higher PVC burden on the first day was correlated with a higher daily (R2=0.34) and 6-hour burden variation (R2=0.48). Three-day monitoring by SEP identified 29% (12/42), 18% (10/56), and 7% (4/60) more patients reaching 10%, 15%, and 20% of daily PVC burden, respectively. Younger age was additionally associated with the identification of clinically significant PVC burden during the extended monitoring period (P=.02).

CONCLUSIONS We found that the mobiCARE MC-100 SEP accurately detects PVC with comparable diagnostic yield to the 24-hour Holter monitor. Performing 3-day PVC monitoring with SEP, especially among younger patients, may offer a pragmatic alternative for identifying more individuals exceeding the clinically significant PVC burden threshold.

©Hyo-Jeong Ahn, Eue-Keun Choi, So-Ryoung Lee, Soonil Kwon, Hee-Seok Song, Young-Shin Lee, Seil Oh. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 21.03.2024.

Keywords

ECGEKGcardiologycardiovascularelectrocardiogramextended monitorheartpremature ventricular complexsingle-lead electrocardiogramwearablewearable device

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1 (A) Distribution of the patients with premature ventricular complex. (B) Comparison of the burden of premature ventricular complex evaluated by the Holter monitor and the adhesive single-lead electrocardiogram patch. ECG: electrocardiogram; PVC: premature ventricular complex.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Agreement for the premature ventricular complex burden between Holter monitoring and adhesive single-lead electrocardiogram patch monitoring (mobiCARE MC-100) on day 1 analyzed by (A) Bland-Altman plot with limits of agreement and (B) scatter plot. LOA: limits of agreement; PVC: premature ventricular complex.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Correlation of the premature ventricular complex burden with (A) daily burden variation and (B) 6-hour burden variation. PVC: premature ventricular complex.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Patients additionally identified to reach the daily premature ventricular complex burden of 10%, 15%, and 20% during the 3-day monitoring with the adhesive single-lead electrocardiogram patch (mobiCARE MC-100). PVC: premature ventricular complex.

그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC10995782)

Comment · 정정

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: HSS and YSL are stockholders of Seers Technology Co, Ltd. EKC received the research grants or speaking fees from Abbott, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Biosense Webster, Chong Kun Dang, Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co, Daiichi-Sankyo, DeepQure, Dreamtech Co, Ltd, Jeil Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Medtronic, Samjinpharm, Seers Technology, and Skylabs. Stock options were received from Seers Technology and Skylab.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
저널
Journal of medical Internet research · eISSN 1438-8871
전자 출판
2024-03-21
MeSH
Male · Humans · Middle Aged · Prospective Studies · Ventricular Premature Complexes* / diagnosis · Electrocardiography · Electrocardiography, Ambulatory · Technology
참고문헌
25편