SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

J Diabetes Investig. 2018;9(5):1110-1118.

Postprandial glucose-lowering effect of premeal consumption of protein-enriched, dietary fiber-fortified bar in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus or normal glucose tolerance.

, , , ,

제1저자 배재현 · 교신저자 조영민

PMID 29502350 PMC6123026 DOI 10.1111/jdi.12831 IF 3.6 내분비대사내과
소속 (2)
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Cheju Halla General Hospital, Jeju, Korea.

Abstract

AIMS/INTRODUCTION Protein preload improves postprandial glycemia by stimulating secretion of insulin and incretin hormones. However, it requires a large dose of protein to produce a significant effect. The present study was carried out to investigate the postprandial glucose-lowering effect of a premeal protein-enriched, dietary fiber-fortified bar (PFB), which contains moderate amounts of protein, in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus or normal glucose tolerance (NGT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS The participants (15 type 2 diabetes mellitus and 15 NGT) were randomly assigned to either a premeal or postmeal PFB group and underwent two mixed meal tolerance tests, 1 week apart in reverse order. Plasma levels of glucose, insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide were measured.

RESULTS During the mixed meal tolerance tests, the incremental area under the curve from 0 to 180 min of plasma glucose levels was lower with premeal PFB than with postmeal PFB in the type 2 diabetes mellitus (14,723 ± 1,310 mg min/dL vs 19,642 ± 1,367 mg min/dL; P = 0.0002) and NGT participants (3,943 ± 416 mg min/dL vs 4,827 ± 520 mg min/dL, P = 0.0296). In the type 2 diabetes mellitus participants, insulinogenic index and the incremental area under the curve from 0 to 180 min of plasma total glucagon-like peptide-1 levels were higher with premeal PFB than with postmeal PFB, but not in the NGT participants. There was no difference in postprandial glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide levels between premeal and postmeal PFB in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS Acute administration of premeal PFB decreased postprandial glucose excursion in both type 2 diabetes mellitus and NGT participants. In the type 2 diabetes mellitus participants, premeal PFB augmented the early-phase insulin secretion, possibly through enhancing glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion.

© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Keywords

Dietary fiberPostprandial hyperglycemiaWhey proteins

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1 Study design and procedures. The study participants underwent the mixed meal tolerance test on 2 separate days, 1 week apart. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups and had a protein‐enriched, dietary fiber‐fortified bar (PFB) followed by breakfast (premeal PFB) or breakfast followed by a PFB (postmeal PFB). After 1 week, the participants were provided with a PFB and breakfast in the reverse order. GIP, glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide; GLP‐1, glucagon‐like peptide‐1; MMTT, mixed meal tolerance test.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Postprandial glucose levels in the participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus and normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Postprandial glucose levels were measured during the mixed meal tolerance test in the type 2 diabetes mellitus and NGT participants. (a) Postprandial glucose levels in the type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. (b) Postprandial glucose levels in the NGT participants. (c) The incremental area under the curve (iAUC) from 0 to 180 min of plasma glucose levels in the type 2 diabetes mellitus and NGT participants. Black circle/bar, premeal bar; white circle/bar, postmeal bar. Two‐way repeated measures anova was used to determine statistical significance. The iAUCs of plasma glucose levels were calculated according to the trapezoid rule and analyzed by paired t‐test. Data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Postprandial insulin levels and insulinogenic index (IGI) in the participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus and normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Postprandial insulin levels were measured during the mixed meal tolerance test in the type 2 diabetes mellitus and NGT participants. (a) Postprandial insulin levels in the type 2 diabetes mellitus participants. (b) Postprandial insulin levels in the NGT participants. (c) The incremental area under the curve (iAUC) from 0 to 180 min of plasma insulin levels in the type 2 diabetes mellitus and NGT participants. IGI was calculated as (insulin 30 min – insulin 0 min)/(glucose 30 min – glucose 0 min). (d) IGI in the type 2 diabetes mellitus and NGT participants. Black circle/bar, premeal bar; white circle/bar, postmeal bar. Two‐way repeated measures anova was used to determine statistical significance. The iAUCs of plasma insulin levels were calculated according to the trapezoid rule and analyzed by paired t‐test. IGI was analyzed by paired t‐test. Data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean. *P<0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Postprandial total glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) and total glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) levels in the participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus and normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Postprandial total GLP‐1 and GIP levels were measured during the mixed meal tolerance test in the type 2 diabetes mellitus and NGT participants. (a) Postprandial total GLP‐1 levels in the type 2 diabetes mellitus participants. (b) Postprandial total GLP‐1 levels in the NGT participants. (c) The incremental area under the curve from 0 to 180 min (iAUC 0–180) of plasma total GLP‐1 levels in the type 2 diabetes mellitus and NGT participants. (d) Postprandial total GIP levels in the type 2 diabetes mellitus participants. (e) Postprandial total GIP levels in the NGT participants. (f) The iAUC 0–180 of plasma total GIP levels in the type 2 diabetes mellitus and NGT participants. Black circle/bar, premeal bar; white circle/bar, postmeal bar. Two‐way repeated measures anova was used to determine statistical significance. The iAUCs of plasma total GLP‐1 and total GIP levels were calculated according to the trapezoid rule and analyzed by the paired t‐test. Data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean. *P<0.05.

그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC6123026)

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
저널
Journal of diabetes investigation · eISSN 2040-1124
전자 출판
2018-03-30
MeSH
Adult · Aged · Blood Glucose / metabolism · Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / blood / diet therapy · Dietary Fiber / administration & dosage · Dietary Proteins / administration & dosage · Female · Food, Fortified* · Glucose Tolerance Test / trends · Humans · Male · Middle Aged · Postprandial Period / physiology
Substances
Blood Glucose · Dietary Fiber · Dietary Proteins
연구비
Korea Health Industry Development Institute · Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea HI14C1277
참고문헌
55편