SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e42717.

Deep Learning With Chest Radiographs for Making Prognoses in Patients With COVID-19: Retrospective Cohort Study.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

제1저자 이현우, 양현준 · 교신저자 진광남

PMID 36795468 PMC9937110 DOI 10.2196/42717 IF 8.2 호흡기내과
소속 (23)
  1. Division of Respiratory and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  2. College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  3. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  4. AI Graduate School, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
  5. Department of Radiology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  6. Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  7. Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  8. Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
  9. Department of Radiology, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
  10. Department of Radiology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
  11. Department of Radiology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
  12. Department of Radiology, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  13. Department of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
  14. Department of Radiology, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  15. Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  16. Department of Radiology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  17. Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
  18. Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  19. Department of Radiology, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  20. Department of Radiology, Yeungnam University Hospital, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  21. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  22. Department of Radiology, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  23. Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Busan, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND An artificial intelligence (AI) model using chest radiography (CXR) may provide good performance in making prognoses for COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop and validate a prediction model using CXR based on an AI model and clinical variables to predict clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS This retrospective longitudinal study included patients hospitalized for COVID-19 at multiple COVID-19 medical centers between February 2020 and October 2020. Patients at Boramae Medical Center were randomly classified into training, validation, and internal testing sets (at a ratio of 8:1:1, respectively). An AI model using initial CXR images as input, a logistic regression model using clinical information, and a combined model using the output of the AI model (as CXR score) and clinical information were developed and trained to predict hospital length of stay (LOS) ≤2 weeks, need for oxygen supplementation, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The models were externally validated in the Korean Imaging Cohort of COVID-19 data set for discrimination and calibration.

RESULTS The AI model using CXR and the logistic regression model using clinical variables were suboptimal to predict hospital LOS ≤2 weeks or the need for oxygen supplementation but performed acceptably in the prediction of ARDS (AI model area under the curve [AUC] 0.782, 95% CI 0.720-0.845; logistic regression model AUC 0.878, 95% CI 0.838-0.919). The combined model performed better in predicting the need for oxygen supplementation (AUC 0.704, 95% CI 0.646-0.762) and ARDS (AUC 0.890, 95% CI 0.853-0.928) compared to the CXR score alone. Both the AI and combined models showed good calibration for predicting ARDS (P=.079 and P=.859).

CONCLUSIONS The combined prediction model, comprising the CXR score and clinical information, was externally validated as having acceptable performance in predicting severe illness and excellent performance in predicting ARDS in patients with COVID-19.

©Hyun Woo Lee, Hyun Jun Yang, Hyungjin Kim, Ue-Hwan Kim, Dong Hyun Kim, Soon Ho Yoon, Soo-Youn Ham, Bo Da Nam, Kum Ju Chae, Dabee Lee, Jin Young Yoo, So Hyeon Bak, Jin Young Kim, Jin Hwan Kim, Ki Beom Kim, Jung Im Jung, Jae-Kwang Lim, Jong Eun Lee, Myung Jin Chung, Young Kyung Lee, Young Seon Kim, Sang Min Lee, Woocheol Kwon, Chang Min Park, Yun-Hyeon Kim, Yeon Joo Jeong, Kwang Nam Jin, Jin Mo Goo. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 16.02.2023.

Keywords

AI modelCOVID-19artificial intelligenceclinical outcomedeep learningmachine learningmedical imagingprediction modelprognosisradiography, thoracic

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1 Illustration of the data flow model for artificial intelligence–assisted prediction. Our deep learning model was developed in two stages to ensure robust performance: (1) backbone training and (2) model training. ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome. Conv2D: Convolution 2D.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Representative cases in the test set database. (A) Chest radiograph of a 65-year-old woman who survived for 32 days after hospitalization. She had no cardiopulmonary comorbidities. She required oxygen supplementation but did not meet the operational definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome. The radiograph shows multiple consolidations and ground-glass opacities in both lung fields. The heat map mainly distinguishes the focal consolidative opacities of both lung fields. The image demonstrates red areas not only in the right lower and left upper lung fields but also around both shoulder joints, because lung segmentation was not applied in our model. The combined model, using chest radiography scores and clinical information, predicted a 40.9% chance of hospital length of stay ≤2 weeks, 74.5% chance of oxygen supplementation, and 33% chance of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome. (B) Chest radiograph of a 93-year-old man who died after 18 days of hospitalization. This patient had a previous history of heart disease. He required oxygen supplementation and met the operational definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome. The radiograph shows diffuse ground-glass opacities in both lung fields. The heat map mainly distinguishes the bilateral ground-glass opacities of both lung fields. The combined model, using chest radiography scores and clinical information, predicted a 57.8% chance of hospital length of stay ≤2 weeks, 96.4% chance of oxygen supplementation, and 99.1% chance of acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Externally validated performance of the artificial intelligence model with chest radiography score, logistic regression model with clinical information, and the combined prediction model. (A) Hospital LOS ≤2 weeks. (B) Oxygen supplementation. (C) Development of ARDS. ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; AUC: area under the curve; CXR: chest radiography; LOS: length of stay.

그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC9937110)

Comment · 정정

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: HK received consulting fees from Radisen; holds stock and stock options in MEDICALIP. Outside this study, SHY works as a chief medical officer in the MEDICAL IP.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
저널
Journal of medical Internet research · eISSN 1438-8871
전자 출판
2023-02-16
MeSH
Humans · Artificial Intelligence · COVID-19* / diagnostic imaging · Deep Learning* · Longitudinal Studies · Retrospective Studies · Radiography · Oxygen · Prognosis · Respiratory Distress Syndrome*
Substances
Oxygen
참고문헌
36편