SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

J Gastric Cancer. 2022;22(4):339-347.

Extragastric Metastasis of Early Gastric Cancer After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection With Lymphovascular Invasion and Negative Resected Margins.

, , , ,

제1저자 이한명 · 교신저자 조수정

소속 (3)
  1. Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  3. Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. crystal5@snu.ac.kr.

Abstract

PURPOSE Lymphovascular invasion is a criterion for non-curative resection in patients who have undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC). We aimed to determine the rate of extragastric metastasis (EGM) and identify the predictors of EGM in patients with negative resection margins (R0 resection) and lymphovascular invasion in post-ESD pathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 2,983 patients underwent ESD for EGC. Among them, 110 had a pathology of R0 resection and positive lymphovascular invasion. Patients underwent additional gastrectomy (n=63) or further follow-up without gastrectomy (n=47).

RESULTS The 110 patients were assigned to one of the 3 groups according to ESD indications based on post-ESD pathology. The first group satisfied the absolute indication for ESD (n=18), the second group satisfied the expanded indications for ESD (n=34), and the last group satisfied the beyond indication (n=58). The number of occurrences of EGM in each group was 1 (5.6%), 3 (8.8%), and 3 (5.2%), respectively. The logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, tumor size, and indication for ESD, showed that larger tumor size was associated with EGM (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-3.10; P=0.048). In contrast, ESD indication criteria did not affect EGM (P=0.349).

CONCLUSIONS Tumor size was the only predictive indicator for EGM in patients who underwent R0 resection and lymphovascular invasion on post-ESD pathology. Even patients with pathology corresponding to the absolute indication criteria of ESD had lymphovascular invasion, which means that they require additional gastrectomy due to the risk of EGM.

Copyright © 2022. Korean Gastric Cancer Association.

Keywords

Endoscopic submucosal dissectionLymphatic metastasisNeoplasm metastasisStomach neoplasms

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Flowchart and clinical outcomes of patients enrolled in this study. EGC = early gastric cancer; ESD = endoscopic submucosal dissection; LNM = lymph node metastasis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Overall survival curves for patients in observation group and surgery group.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Disease-free survival curves for patients in observation group and surgery group.

그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC9633933)

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article
저널
Journal of gastric cancer · ISSN 2093-582X
연구비
National Research Foundation of Korea #NRF-2019R1A2C1009923 · National Research Foundation of Korea #NRF-2022R1A2B5B01001430 · Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research KCHUGR - 202002001
참고문헌
21편