SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

Am Heart J. 2017;188:53-64.

A laboratory association between hemoglobin and VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

, , , , , , , , , ,

제1저자 김윤기 · 교신저자 서정원

소속 (7)
  1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  2. Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: dasome2@snu.ac.kr.
  3. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
  4. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  5. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  6. Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
  7. Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND VerifyNow P2Y12 assay is used widely to evaluate residual platelet reactivity in patients taking P2Y12 receptor antagonists. However, a laboratory association between VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) and hemoglobin, which might lead to wrong interpretation of the data, is reported. We performed these systematic review and meta-analysis to clearly define the relationship between PRU and hemoglobin and to elucidate whether the relationship, if any, is a true biological association or is just a laboratory error.

METHODS Through a comprehensive electronic and manual search, 10 studies were selected for the cohort level meta-analysis. Among 10 studies, we were able to retrieve the raw data of 5 studies, and a patient-level meta-analysis was performed. Potential publication bias was searched by funnel plot analysis and was actively adjusted, if present, by trim and fill method.

RESULTS The pooled analysis revealed a significant inverse correlation between PRU and hemoglobin (r=-0.349; P<.001; 10 studies with 4,793 patients). VerifyNow P2Y12 base unit, which reflects off-drug platelet reactivity, was also inversely correlated with hemoglobin (r=-0.526; P<.001; 8 studies with 4,395 patients). % Inhibition (r=0.081; P=.059; 6 studies with 3,832 patients) and ΔPRU (r=-0.037; P=.188; 5 studies with 3,521 patients) were not associated with hemoglobin. A significant inverse association between PRU and hemoglobin was also observed in the patient-level meta-analysis (3,533 patients pooled from 5 studies; r=-0.335; P<.001). Light transmission aggregometry (r=0.160; P=.072; 4 studies with 1,144 patients) and multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (r=-0.029; P=.394; 3 studies with 7,645 patients) showed no significant association with hemoglobin.

CONCLUSIONS A significant inverse association was observed between PRU and hemoglobin which is likely to be a laboratory error. Clinicians should be aware that this association might lead to wrong interpretation of the data.

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review
저널
American heart journal · eISSN 1097-6744
전자 출판
2017-03-15
MeSH
Blood Platelets / drug effects · Coronary Artery Disease / blood / drug therapy · Hemoglobins / metabolism · Humans · Platelet Aggregation / drug effects · Platelet Function Tests · Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists / pharmacology
Substances
Hemoglobins · Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists