SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2019;18(6):562-568.

Safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided ethanol ablation for pancreatic cystic lesions: A single-center experience of 214 patients.

, , , , , , ,

제1저자 최진호 · 교신저자 이상협

소속 (2)
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address: gidoctor@snuh.org.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound-guided ethanol ablation (EUS-EA) for pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) has been used in recent years as a feasible treatment modality for low malignant probability PCLs or patients considered high-risk for surgery. The present study aimed to confirm the safety of EUS-EA and to find predictive factors for adverse event (AE).

METHODS A retrospective review was performed from the prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent EUS-EA for PCLs from June 2006 to April 2018 at Seoul National University Hospital. The primary outcomes of the study were the rates of AEs and severe AEs by EUS-EA. The secondary outcome was the predictive factors of AEs including acute pancreatitis and abdominal pain.

RESULTS A total of 214 patients were evaluated and the diagnoses of PCLs according to cystic fluid analysis and clinical features were as follows: serous cystic neoplasm (32.2%), mucinous cystic neoplasm (26.6%), branch duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN) (29.4%), and pseudocyst (11.7%). Three patients (1.4%) experienced severe AEs. Overall, AEs occurred in 71 (33.2%) patients. BD-IPMN (OR: 2.87; 95% CI: 1.05-7.84; P = 0.040), multilocular cysts (OR: 3.59; 95% CI: 1.09-11.85; P = 0.036), suspected ethanol leakage during procedure (OR: 10.68; 95% CI: 1.98-57.53; P = 0.006), and sticky cystic fluid (OR: 3.83; 95% CI: 1.20-12.24; P = 0.024) were predictive factors for post-procedural acute pancreatitis. PCLs of uncinate process (OR: 2.99; 95% CI: 1.22-7.35; P = 0.017) and PCLs with exophytic portion (OR: 3.70; 95% CI: 1.96-7.01; P < 0.001) were predictive factors for post-procedural abdominal pain.

CONCLUSIONS EUS-EA is a safe procedure with a very low rate of severe AEs. It seems possible to predict the AEs according to the features of the procedure and PCLs.

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Keywords

Adverse eventsEUS-guided ethanol ablationPancreatic cyst

Comment · 정정

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article
저널
Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international : HBPD INT · ISSN 1499-3872
전자 출판
2019-09-11
MeSH
Abdominal Pain / etiology · Ablation Techniques* / adverse effects · Adult · Aged · Databases, Factual · Ethanol / administration & dosage / adverse effects · Female · Humans · Male · Middle Aged · Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous / diagnostic imaging / surgery · Postoperative Pain / etiology · Pancreatic Cyst / diagnostic imaging / surgery · Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging / surgery · Pancreatic Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging / surgery · Pancreatic Pseudocyst / diagnostic imaging / surgery · Pancreatitis / etiology · Patient Safety · Retrospective Studies · Risk Assessment · Risk Factors · Seoul · Treatment Outcome · Ultrasonography, Interventional*
Substances
Ethanol