SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

Gut Liver. 2024;18(2):328-337.

Optimal Follow-up of Incidental Pancreatic Cystic Lesions without Worrisome Features: Clinical Outcome after Long-term Follow-up.

, , , , , , , ,

제1저자 안동원 · 교신저자 이상협

소속 (3)
  1. Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS : The optimal duration and interval of follow-up for cystic lesions of the pancreas (CLPs) is not well established. This study was performed to investigate the optimal duration and interval of follow-up for CLPs in clinical practice.

METHODS : Patients with CLPs without worrisome features or high-risk stigmata underwent follow-up with computed tomography at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and then every 12 months thereafter. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed.

RESULTS : A total of 227 patients with CLPs detected from 2000 to 2008 (mean initial diameter, 1.3±0.6 cm) underwent follow-up for a median of 120 months. Twenty-two patients (9.7%) underwent surgery after a median of 47.5 months. Malignancies developed in four patients (1.8%), one within 5 years and three within 10 years. One hundred and fourteen patients (50.2%) were followed up for more than 10 years. No malignancy developed after 10 years of follow-up. During surveillance, 37 patients (16.3%) experienced progression to surgical indication. In patients with CLPs less than 2 cm in diameter, development of surgical indications did not occur within 24 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS : CLPs should be continuously monitored after 5 years because of the persistent potential for malignant transformation of CLPs. An interval of 24 months for initial follow-up might be enough for CLPs with initial size of less than 2 cm in clinical practice.

Keywords

Pancreatic cystPancreatic neoplasms

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Algorithm for initial identification and enrollment of patients. CLPs, cystic lesions of the pancreas; PKD, polycystic kidney disease; VHL, von Hippel-Lindau disease; WF, worrisome feature; HRS, high-risk stigmata.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Patterns of the change in the size of cystic lesion of the pancreas during follow-up.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Cumulative incidence of the progression to surgical indication. The number in bracket means the cumulative number of patients who received actual surgery in each follow-up time. (A) Overall patients. (B) Stratification with initial cyst size.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Receiver operating characteristic curves of different risk scores for predicting malignant cystic lesion of the pancreas. WF, worrisome feature; HRS, high-risk stigmata, AUC, areas under the curve; CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Suggested surveillance protocol throughout the follow-up based on the initial cyst size. CLPs, cystic lesions of the pancreas; WF, worrisome feature; HRS, high-risk stigmata; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC10938161)

Comment · 정정

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST . No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article
저널
Gut and liver · eISSN 2005-1212
전자 출판
2023-10-10
MeSH
Humans · Follow-Up Studies · Pancreatic Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging / surgery / epidemiology · Retrospective Studies · Disease Progression · Pancreas / diagnostic imaging / surgery / pathology · Pancreatic Cyst* / diagnostic imaging / surgery / pathology
참고문헌
26편