Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025;17:17588359251370492.
Effectiveness and cost analysis of liposomal irinotecan in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multicenter real-world study.
제1저자 전중원, 김영애 · 교신저자 황진혁, 우상명
소속 (8)
- Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13620, Republic of Korea.
- Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, 323, Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10408, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic chemotherapy is crucial for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC). It serves as a palliative chemotherapy for unresectable PAC and as a (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy for (borderline) resectable PAC. Survival benefits were found with the use of liposomal irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI/5-FU/LV) in the global phase III NAPOLI-1 trial. However, limited evidence supports the cost-effectiveness of liposomal irinotecan throughout the PAC treatment course.
OBJECTIVES We investigated the real-world efficacy and cost implications of nal-IRI/5-FU/LV in PAC management.
DESIGN A multicenter real-world study.
METHODS We analyzed real-world data from electronic health records to evaluate outcomes of nal-IRI/5-FU/LV exposure in this retrospective study. Effectiveness was assessed using overall survival (OS). Medical costs were those incurred from imaging or laboratory tests, chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, and supportive care during inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department visits. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for potential differences in patient characteristics between the nal-IRI and non-liposomal irinotecan groups. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated by dividing cost differences by survival gains.
RESULTS Overall, 1734 patients diagnosed with PAC were screened, and 705 who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy were included in the analysis. The median OS was significantly longer in the nal-IRI group than in the non-liposomal irinotecan group (28.0 vs 18.3 months, p = 0.011). Patients in the nal-IRI group had more hospital visits and admissions during follow-up and incurred higher costs ($61,430 vs $39,129 per patient), which resulted in an ICER of $2787 per month of survival gained ($33,285 per life-year gained).
CONCLUSION Despite its higher cost, nal-IRI/5-FU/LV significantly improved the survival of patients with PAC compared to the conventional chemotherapies. Our findings suggest that it may be a cost-effective treatment option for gemcitabine failure despite the high cost of liposomal irinotecan, considering the poor prognosis of PAC.
© The Author(s), 2025.
Keywords
chemotherapycost-effectivenessliposomal irinotecanpancreatic cancerreal-world evidence
Figures
그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC12433562)
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
그 밖의 정보
- 출판 형태
- Journal Article
- 저널
- Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · ISSN 1758-8340
- 전자 출판
- 2025-09-13
- 참고문헌
- 27편