SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0185501.

Risk factors for early metachronous tumor development after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer.

, , , , , , , ,

제1저자 박재용 · 교신저자 김상균

소속 (3)
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Metachronous gastric tumor (MGT) is one of major concerns after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC). Optimal follow-up strategy has not been yet well-established. The aim of this study was to identify the different clinical features of the patients according to the time interval to development of MGT.

METHODS Among 1,780 consecutive patients with EGC who underwent ESD between 2005 and 2014, 115 patients with MGT were retrospectively reviewed. MGT was defined as secondary gastric cancer or dysplasia detected > 1 year after initial ESD. Clinicopathological factors associated with early development of MGT were evaluated.

RESULTS The median interval to development of MGT was 37 months. In univariate analysis, the median interval to MGT was shorter if EGC lesion was non-elevated type (39.4 vs 57.0 months, p = 0.011), or synchronous primary lesion was absent (39.8 vs 51.4 months, p = 0.050). In multivariate Cox's proportional hazards analysis, the hazard ratios for early occurrence of MGT were 1.966 (95% CI: 1.141-3.386, p = 0.015) and 1.911 (95% CI: 1.163-3.141, p = 0.011), respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival after diagnosis of MGT between the early occurrence group and the late occurrence group.

CONCLUSIONS Non-elevated gross type and absence of synchronous gastric tumor were independent risk factors for early development of MGT. Meticulous endoscopic inspection is especially important for the detection of MGT during the early follow-up period in patients with these initial tumor characteristics.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1 Overview of patient selection process. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for enrolled patients are shown. EGC, early gastric cancer; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; MGT, metachronous gastric tumor.
Fig 2
Fig 2 Cumulative incidence of MGT after ESD. This Kaplan-Meier curve shows the trend of development of metachronous gastric tumors after ESD over time.
Fig 3
Fig 3 Factors associated with early occurrence of MGT after ESD. (A) Cumulative incidence of MGT by gross type. (B) Cumulative incidence of MGT by presence of synchronous primary lesions.
Fig 4
Fig 4 Survival analysis of the patients with MGT after ESD. (A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve for overall survival in the whole patient group. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for overall survival in early occurrence group and late occurrence group. (C) Kaplan-Meier survival curve for overall survival after diagnosis of MGT in the whole patient group. (D) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for overall survival after diagnosis of MGT in early occurrence group and late occurrence group.

그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC5614623)

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests:The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article
저널
PloS one · eISSN 1932-6203
전자 출판
2017-09-26
MeSH
Aged · Endoscopy / methods · Female · Gastroscopy / methods · Helicobacter Infections / complications / drug therapy / microbiology · Helicobacter pylori / isolation & purification · Humans · Male · Middle Aged · Retrospective Studies · Risk Factors · Stomach Neoplasms / complications / pathology / surgery · Survival Analysis
참고문헌
33편