SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

J Clin Med. 2019;8(12):jcm8122228.

Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulant for Secondary Prevention in Asians with Atrial Fibrillation.

, , , , , , , , ,

제1저자 박지석, 이소령 · 교신저자 최의근

소속 (5)
  1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
  2. Department of Medical Statistics, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
  3. Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
  4. Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Chest & Heart Hospital, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK.
  5. Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.

Abstract

We investigated the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for secondary prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly focusing on subgroups of patients with severe, disabling, and recent stroke. Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service claims database between January 2010 and April 2018, we selected OAC-naïve patients with non-valvular AF and a history of stroke. Cumulative risks for recurrent stroke, major bleeding, composite outcome (recurrent stroke + major bleeding), and mortality were compared between DOAC and warfarin groups. Among 61,568 patients, 28,839 and 32,729 received warfarin and DOACs, respectively. Compared with warfarin, DOACs were associated with lower risks of recurrent stroke (hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.72), major bleeding (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66-0.80), composite outcome (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.65-0.73), and mortality. DOAC use resulted in a consistent trend of improved outcomes in the subgroups of patients with severe, disabling, and recent stroke. In conclusion, DOACs were associated with lower risks of recurrent stroke, major bleeding, composite clinical outcomes, and mortality in patients with AF and a history of stroke. These results were consistent across all types of DOACs and subgroups of patients with severe, disabling, and recent stroke.

Keywords

anticoagulantsatrial fibrillationsecondary preventionstroke

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1 Comparison of clinical outcomes according to antithrombotic therapy (warfarin vs. four DOACs). CI, confidence interval; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; HR, hazard ratio; IR, incidence rate.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Comparison of clinical outcomes according to antithrombotic therapy among subgroups with recent or severe/disabling stroke. CI = confidence interval, DOAC = direct oral anticoagulant; HR = hazard ratio, ICU = intensive care unit, IR = incidence rate.

그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC6947173)

Conflict of interest statement

J.P., S.-R.L., K.-D.H., J.-H.J., M.-J.C., S.O.: None. E.-K.C.: Research grant from Daiichi-Sankyo, BMS/Pfizer, and Biosense Webster. G.Y.H.L.: Consultant for Bayer/Janssen, BMS/Pfizer, Medtronic, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Verseon, and Daiichi-Sankyo; speaker for Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Medtronic, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi-Sankyo. No fees are directly received personally.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article
저널
Journal of clinical medicine · ISSN 2077-0383
전자 출판
2019-12-17
연구비
Seoul National University Hospital Research Fund 04-2019-3110
참고문헌
29편