SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(23):e028040.

Prognostic Implications of Mechanical Phenotypes in Heart Failure Characterized by 3-Chamber Strain Echocardiography.

, , , , , ,

제1저자 박지석 · 교신저자 조구영

소속 (4)
  1. Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seongnam Gyeonggi-do Republic of Korea.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea.
  3. Cardiovascular Center and Department of Internal Medicine Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of Korea.
  4. Department of Cardiology, Internal Medicine Chungnam National University Hospital Daejeon Republic of Korea.

Abstract

Background Heart failure (HF) involves dysfunction of the left ventricle (LV) as well as left atrium and right ventricle. We characterized mechanical phenotypes of HF using 3-chamber strain echocardiography and compared their clinical outcomes. Methods and Results We retrospectively analyzed 3574 patients (median age, 74 years; male 52.8%) with acute HF who underwent 3-chamber strain echocardiography. Patients were classified as with LV, left atrium, or right ventricle myopathy if their corresponding strain values (LV global longitudinal strain, left atrium reservoir strain, and right ventricle global longitudinal strain) were lower than median cutoffs, respectively. The mechanical phenotypes of individual patients were characterized according to the combined myopathy. The primary outcome was a composite end point of 5-year all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization. During follow-up (median, 25.8 months), the primary outcome occurred in 1877 (52.5%) patients. Three-chamber strain values were independent predictors for the primary outcome. An incremental trend was observed for the primary outcome, along with the increasing numbers of combined myopathy. Each mechanical phenotype exhibited an increased risk of the primary outcome, with the highest risk observed in patients with 3-chamber myopathy (hazard ratio, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.42-1.96]). The prognostic significance of the mechanical phenotypes was feasible across the conventional HF subtypes stratified by LV ejection fraction. In HF with preserved ejection fraction, the presence of left atrium and right ventricle myopathy significantly increased the primary outcome, regardless of combined left ventricle myopathy. Conclusions Assessment of 3-chamber strain in HF enables characterization of distinctive mechanical phenotypes, which provides an independent prognostic value that may support long-term risk stratification.

Keywords

echocardiographyheart failuremyopathystrain

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1 Primary outcome according to numbers of involved chambers with myopathy. An incremental trend was observed for primary outcome associated with the increasing numbers of involved chambers with myopathy. HR indicates hazard ratio; and IR, incidence rate.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Primary outcome according to specific mechanical phenotypes. Each mechanical phenotype demonstrated a significant increase in primary outcome, where the risk increment was prominent with expanding ranges of myopathy. HR indicates hazard ratio; IR, incidence rate; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; and RV, right ventricle.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Comparison of 3‐chamber strain values between subgroups of conventional HF subtypes. In subgroups with conventional HF subtypes, all strain values showed a decreasing trend from HFpEF to HFmrEF to HFrEF. In HFrEF, the proportions of patients with LV, LA, and RV myopathy were 74.3%, 62.0%, and 59.4%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in HFpEF and HFmrEF. GLS indicates global longitudinal strain; HF, heart failure; HFmrEF; HF with mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction; HFpEF, HF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction; HFrEF, HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Primary outcome according to mechanical phenotypes in subgroups of conventional HF subtypes. Similar trends were observed across the HF subtypes, with incremental risk of primary outcome associated with increasing extent of myopathy. In HFpEF, primary outcome significantly increased in patients with myopathy involving LA and RV, even without LV myopathy. HF indicates heart failure; HFmrEF, HF with mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction; HFpEF, HF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction; HFrEF, HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction; HR, hazard ratio; IR, incidence rate; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; and RV, right ventricle.

그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC9851439)

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article
저널
Journal of the American Heart Association · eISSN 2047-9980
전자 출판
2022-11-23
MeSH
Male · Humans · Prognosis · Retrospective Studies · Echocardiography · Heart Failure* / diagnostic imaging · Muscular Diseases*
참고문헌
25편