SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(7):974-983.

Noncontrast Myocardial T1 Mapping by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Predicts Outcome in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.

, , , , , , , , , ,

제1저자 이희선 · 교신저자 이승표

소속 (6)
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
  4. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  5. Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany.
  6. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: splee0624@gmail.com.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate whether native T1 value of the myocardium on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) could predict clinical events in patients with significant aortic stenosis (AS).

BACKGROUND Although previous studies have demonstrated the prognostic value of focal fibrosis using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by CMR in AS patients, the prognostic implication of diffuse myocardial fibrosis by noninvasive imaging remains unknown.

METHODS A prospective observational longitudinal study was performed in 127 consecutive patients with moderate or severe AS (68.8 ± 9.2 years of age, 49.6% male) and 33 age- and sex-matched controls who underwent 3-T CMR. The degree of diffuse myocardial fibrosis was assessed by noncontrast mapping of T1 relaxation time using modified Look-Locker inversion-recovery sequence, and the presence and extent of LGE were also evaluated. The AS patients were divided into 3 groups by the native T1 value. Primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure.

RESULTS Native T1 value was higher in AS patients, compared with control subjects (1,232 ± 53 ms vs. 1,185 ± 37 ms; p = 0.008). During follow-up (median 27.9 months), there were 24 clinical events including 9 deaths (6 pre-operative and 3 post-operative), the majority of which occurred in the patients in the highest T1 tertile group (2.4% vs. 11.6% vs. 42.9% for lowest, mid-, and highest tertile groups; p < 0.001 by log-rank test). The total number of events for both pre- and post-operative events also occurred more frequently in patients in the highest T1 tertile group. EuroSCORE II, the presence and/or extent of LGE, and the native T1 value were predictors of poor prognosis (adjusted hazard ratio for every 20-ms increase of native T1: 1.28; p = 0.003). In particular, the highest native T1 value provided further risk stratification regardless of the presence of LGE.

CONCLUSIONS High native T1 value on noncontrast T1 mapping CMR is a novel, independent predictor of adverse outcome in patients with significant AS.

Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

aortic stenosiscardiac magnetic resonancenative T1 mappingprognosis

Comment · 정정

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article, Observational Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
저널
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · eISSN 1876-7591
전자 출판
2017-11-15
MeSH
Aged · Aortic Valve Stenosis / complications / diagnostic imaging / mortality / therapy · Case-Control Studies · Cause of Death · Female · Fibrosis · Heart Failure / etiology / mortality / therapy · Hospitalization · Humans · Longitudinal Studies · Magnetic Resonance Imaging* · Male · Middle Aged · Myocardium / pathology · Predictive Value of Tests · Prognosis · Prospective Studies · Risk Factors · Severity of Illness Index · Time Factors