Ther Adv Hematol. 2020;11:2040620720921046.
Incorporating hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation after second-line carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd).
제1저자 변자민 · 교신저자 윤성수
소속 (9)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditionally believed to be an integral part of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, the role of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is being challenged. As such, we sought to evaluate the impact of HSCT in the era of novel agents.
METHODS A multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal cohort study was carried out between January 2016 and December 2018. A total of 55 patients who received VTD (bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone) as first-line treatment and KRd (carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone) as second-line treatment were analyzed for outcomes.
RESULTS The enrolled patients were divided into Group 1, defined as those who continued KRd treatment until progression (n = 41), versus Group 2, defined as those who underwent HSCT after a certain number of cycles of KRd (n = 14). Both groups showed a generally favorable response to KRd, with overall response rate (ORR) of 87.9% and clinical benefit rate of 92.8% after a median of seven cycles in Group 1, and ORR 92.8% and clinical benefit rate 100% after median of five cycles in Group 2. However, significantly poorer progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.004) was observed in Group 1 (median 12 months) compared with Group 2 (median not reached). Multivariate analyses identified HSCT after KRd as potential risk factors associated with PFS. Also, in Group 1, bortezomib refractoriness was associated with significantly shorter PFS compared with those who were responsive (median 12 months versus 14 months, respectively, p = 0.039).
CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, even with the advent of novel agents, HSCT still remains a valuable treatment modality with additive efficacy.
© The Author(s), 2020.
Keywords
hematopoietic stem-cell transplantationmultiple myelomanovel therapy
Figures
그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC7236395)
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement: The author(s) declare that there is no conflict of interest.
그 밖의 정보
- 출판 형태
- Journal Article
- 저널
- Therapeutic advances in hematology · ISSN 2040-6207
- 전자 출판
- 2020-05-12
- 참고문헌
- 21편