Transplantation. 2021;105(2):404-412.
Disparity in Accessibility to and Prognosis of Kidney Transplantation According to Economic Inequality in South Korea: A Widening Gap After Expansion of Insurance Coverage.
제1저자 박세훈, 박기찬 · 교신저자 이하정
소속 (9)
- Department of Biomedical Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Division of Clinical Bioinformatics, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Gyeonggio-do, Korea.
- Department of Statistics, Keimyung University, Daegu, Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Kidney Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nationwide studies on the effects of wealth inequality on kidney transplantation are rare, particularly in a country with an expanded National Health Insurance Service and in Asian countries.
METHODS In this nationwide, population-based cohort study, we reviewed the national claims database of Korea in which details of nationwide health insurance are provided. From 2007 to 2015, 9 annual cohorts of end-stage renal disease patients were included. The annual financial statuses were collected and stratified into 5 subgroups in each year: the aided group in which insurance fee was waived and the 4 other groups divided by quartiles of their medical insurance fee. Time trends of incidence proportion of kidney transplantation among end-stage renal disease patients in each year were initially assessed. The risk of graft failure, both including death-censored graft failure and death with a functioning graft, was analyzed as a prognostic outcome within the transplant recipients.
RESULTS Significant disparity in the accessibility of kidney transplantation was present, and it was further widening, particularly from 2009 in which the National Health Insurance Service started to cover desensitized kidney transplantation. Desensitized or preemptive transplantation was less common in the poorest group who were more frequently receiving transplantation after 5 years of dialysis in the latter years. The prognosis of kidney transplantation was significantly worse in the poorer people, and this disparity also worsened during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS Prominent disparity regarding accessibility to and prognosis of kidney transplantation was observed in Korea according to wealth inequality, and this disparity was worsening.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
그 밖의 정보
- 출판 형태
- Journal Article
- 저널
- Transplantation · eISSN 1534-6080
- MeSH
- Adolescent · Adult · Aged · Child · Databases, Factual · Female · Graft Survival · Health Services Accessibility / economics · Healthcare Disparities / economics · Humans · Income · Insurance Coverage / economics · Insurance, Health / economics · Kidney Failure, Chronic / economics / mortality / surgery · Kidney Transplantation / adverse effects / economics / mortality · Male · Middle Aged · Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / economics · Prevalence · Republic of Korea / epidemiology · Social Determinants of Health / economics · Time Factors · Treatment Outcome · Young Adult
- 참고문헌
- 26편