SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025;77(10):1407-1415.

Time-Dependent Effect of Prophylactic Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole on the Incidence of Serious Infections in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: A Target Trial Emulation Study.

, , , , , , ,

제1저자 김윤규 · 교신저자 박준원

PMID 40229227 PMC12353268 DOI 10.1002/art.43185 IF 9.9 류마티스내과
소속 (7)
  1. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  2. Division of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  3. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
  4. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
  5. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  6. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
  7. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of prophylactic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) on the incidence of serious infections in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV).

METHODS This multicenter cohort study was designed to emulate a target trial that studied 296 patients with AAV who were treated with rituximab (RTX) or cyclophosphamide (CYC) as induction therapy. Patients were grouped based on the administration of TMP-SMX within 14 days following induction therapy (n = 240 and 56 patients in prophylaxis and control groups, respectively) (intention-to-treat) and also as a time-dependent exposure (time-varying). Inverse probability weighting was applied to minimize the baseline imbalance between the two groups. The primary outcome was one-year incidence of serious infection.

RESULTS During the 252.1 person-years of observation, 77 cases of serious infections were recorded in 65 patients with a fatality rate of 18.5%. Most serious infections (n = 66, 85.7%) occurred within the first 180 days of observation. The prophylaxis group showed a significantly lower incidence of serious infections than the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.72]). However, this beneficial effect of TMP-SMX was only significant during the first 180 days (HR 0.41 [95% CI 0.22-0.76]) and not thereafter (HR 3.67 [95% CI 0.46-29.43]) (interaction P = 0.044). This result was also consistent with the time-varying analysis result. Based on one case of severe adverse drug reaction related to TMP-SMX, the number needed to harm was 127.4, whereas the number needed to treat to prevent one serious infection was 8.0.

CONCLUSION Prophylactic TMP-SMX significantly reduced the risk of serious infections in patients with AAV, particularly during the first six months of induction therapy with RTX or CYC.

© 2025 The Author(s). Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1 Pattern of the prophylactic use of TMP‐SMX and incidence of serious infection in the study population. Each horizontal line indicates the follow‐up period of each patient. Blue and yellow lines indicate follow‐up with and without prophylactic TMP‐SMX. TMP‐SMX, trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier curve showing one‐year incidence of serious infection based on (A) ITT analysis and (B) time‐varying analysis. HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intention‐to‐treat; TMP/SMX, trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole. Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.43185/abstract.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Clinical factors affecting the prophylactic efficacy of TMP‐SMX. AAV, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis; BVAS, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score; GC, glucocorticoid; MPA, microscopic polyangiitis; TMP‐SMX, trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole.

그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC12353268)

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Observational Study
저널
Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · eISSN 2326-5205
전자 출판
2025-05-22
MeSH
Adult · Aged · Female · Humans · Male · Middle Aged · Anti-Bacterial Agents* / therapeutic use · Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis* / drug therapy / complications · Antibiotic Prophylaxis* · Cohort Studies · Cyclophosphamide / therapeutic use · Immunosuppressive Agents / therapeutic use · Incidence · Infections* / epidemiology · Rituximab / therapeutic use · Time Factors · Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination* / therapeutic use
Substances
Anti-Bacterial Agents · Cyclophosphamide · Immunosuppressive Agents · Rituximab · Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
연구비
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072583 · National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2023-00251803
참고문헌
29편