SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(18):1947-1957.

Global Longitudinal Strain to Predict Mortality in Patients With Acute Heart Failure.

, , ,

제1저자 박진주 · 교신저자 조구영

소속 (4)
  1. Cardiovascular Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  3. Department of Cardiology in Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
  4. Cardiovascular Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: cardioch@snu.ac.kr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Heart failure (HF) is currently classified according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); however, the prognostic value of LVEF is controversial. Myocardial strain is a prognostic factor independently of LVEF.

OBJECTIVES The authors sought to evaluate the prognostic value of global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with HF.

METHODS GLS was measured in 4,172 consecutive patients with acute HF. Patients were categorized as either HF with reduced (LVEF <40%), midrange (LVEF 40% to 49%), or preserved ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50%) and were also classified as having mildly (GLS >12.6%), moderately (8.1% < GLS <12.5%), or severely (GLS ≤8.0%) reduced strain. The primary endpoint was 5-year all-cause mortality.

RESULTS Mean GLS was 10.8%, and mean LVEF was 40%. Overall, 1,740 (40.4%) patients had died at 5 years. Patients with reduced ejection fraction had slightly higher mortality than those with midrange or preserved ejection fraction (41%, 38%, and 39%, respectively; log-rank p = 0.031), whereas patients with reduced strain had significantly higher mortality (severely reduced GLS, 49%; moderately reduced GLS, 38%; mildly reduced GLS, 34%; log-rank p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, each 1% increase in GLS was associated with a 5% decreased risk for mortality (p < 0.001). Patients with moderate (hazard ratio: 1.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.13 to 1.53) and severe GLS reductions (hazard ratio: 1.61; 95% confidence interval: 1.36 to 1.91) had higher mortality, but LVEF was not associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS In patients with acute HF, GLS has greater prognostic value than LVEF. Therefore, the authors suggest that GLS should be considered as the standard measurement in all patients with HF. This new concept needs validation in further studies.

Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

all-cause mortalitymyocardial strainprognostic value

Comment · 정정

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study
저널
Journal of the American College of Cardiology · eISSN 1558-3597
MeSH
Aged · Aged, 80 and over · Echocardiography · Female · Heart Failure / diagnostic imaging / mortality · Humans · Male · Middle Aged · Republic of Korea / epidemiology · Stroke Volume