Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(2):811-7.
Inappropriate continued empirical vancomycin use in a hospital with a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
제1저자 김낙현, 구혜림 · 교신저자 김남중
소속 (4)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Infection Control Service, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea Infection Control Service, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea molder@unitel.co.kr.
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
Vancomycin is frequently inappropriately prescribed, especially as empirical treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate (i) the amount of inappropriate continued empirical vancomycin use as a proportion of total vancomycin use and (ii) the risk factors associated with inappropriate continued empirical vancomycin use. We reviewed the medical records of adult patients who had been prescribed at least one dose of parenterally administered vancomycin between January and June 2012, in a single tertiary care hospital. When empirically prescribed vancomycin treatment was continued after 96 h without documentation of beta-lactam-resistant Gram-positive microorganisms in clinical specimens with significance, the continuation was considered inappropriate, and the amount used thereafter was considered inappropriately used. We identified risk factors associated with inappropriate continued empirical vancomycin use by multiple logistic regression. During the study period, the amount of parenterally administered vancomycin prescribed was 34.2 defined daily doses (DDDs)/1,000 patient-days (1,084 prescriptions for 971 patients). The amount of inappropriate continued empirical vancomycin use was 8.5 DDDs/1,000 patient-days, which represented 24.9% of the total parenterally administered vancomycin used (8.5/34.2 DDDs/1,000 patient-days). By multivariate analyses, inappropriate continued empirical vancomycin use was independently associated with the absence of any documented etiological organism (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.60 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.06 to 2.41]) and suspected central nervous system (CNS) infections (aHR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.20 to 4.50]). Higher Charlson's comorbidity index scores were inversely associated with inappropriate continued empirical vancomycin use (aHR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.85 to 0.97]). Inappropriate continued empirical vancomycin use represented 24.9% of the total amount of vancomycin prescribed, which indicates room for improvement.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Comment · 정정
그 밖의 정보
- 출판 형태
- Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- 저널
- Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · eISSN 1098-6596
- 전자 출판
- 2014-11-17
- MeSH
- Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology · Female · Humans · Logistic Models · Male · Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus / drug effects · Prevalence · Retrospective Studies · Risk Factors · Vancomycin / pharmacology
- Substances
- Anti-Bacterial Agents · Vancomycin
- 참고문헌
- 29편