SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1250-1260.

A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety between Combination Therapy and Monotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer (KCSG ST13-10).

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

제1저자 이근욱 · 교신저자 최인실

소속 (14)
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
  3. Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  4. Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.
  5. Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  6. Division of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  7. Center for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  8. Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.
  9. Department of Hematology-Oncology, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  10. Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  11. Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  12. Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  13. Department of Internal Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  14. HERINGS, The Institution of Advanced Clinical & Biomedical Research, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE This study evaluated whether combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC) as first-line chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Elderly (≥ 70 years) chemo-naïve patients with MRGC were allocated to receive either combination therapy (group A: 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]/oxaliplatin, capecitabine/oxaliplatin, capecitabine/cisplatin, or S-1/cisplatin) or monotherapy (group B: 5-FU, capecitabine, or S-1). In group A, starting doses were 80% of standard doses, and they could be escalated to 100% at the discretion of the investigator. Primary endpoint was to confirm superior overall survival (OS) of combination therapy vs. monotherapy.

RESULTS After 111 of the planned 238 patients were randomized, enrollment was terminated due to poor accrual. In the full-analysis population (group A [n=53] and group B [n=51]), median OS of combination therapy vs. monotherapy was 11.5 vs. 7.5 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 1.30; p=0.231). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 vs. 3.7 months (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.83; p=0.005). In subgroup analyses, patients aged 70-74 years tended to have superior OS with combination therapy (15.9 vs. 7.2 months, p=0.056). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred more frequently in group A vs. group B. However, among severe TRAEs (≥ grade 3), there were no TRAEs with a frequency difference of > 5%.

CONCLUSION Combination therapy was associated with numerically improved OS, although statistically insignificant, and a significant PFS benefit compared with monotherapy. Although combination therapy showed more frequent TRAEs, there was no difference in the frequency of severe TRAEs.

Keywords

Drug TherapyElderlyFirst-lineMetastaticStomach Neoplasms

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 CONSORT diagram. FAS, full-analysis set; FL, 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin; FOLFOX, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin; IP, investigational product; PPS, per-protocol set.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Survival curves in full-analysis set: (A) overall survival and (B) progression-free survival. CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Subgroup analysis (overall survival). CAPOX, capecitabine/oxaliplatin; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FOLFOX, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin.

그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC10645518)

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest . Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article
저널
Cancer research and treatment · eISSN 2005-9256
전자 출판
2023-05-25
MeSH
Aged · Humans · Capecitabine · Stomach Neoplasms* / pathology · Oxaliplatin / adverse effects · Cisplatin · Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / drug therapy · Fluorouracil / adverse effects · Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects · Molecular Chaperones / therapeutic use · Tumor Suppressor Proteins
Substances
Capecitabine · Oxaliplatin · Cisplatin · Fluorouracil · ST13 protein, human · Molecular Chaperones · Tumor Suppressor Proteins
연구비
Ministry of Health and Welfare 132054
참고문헌
28편