SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

Korean Circ J. 2024;54(11):743-756.

An Artificial Intelligence-Based Automated Echocardiographic Analysis: Enhancing Efficiency and Prognostic Evaluation in Patients With Revascularized STEMI.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

제1저자 장영걸, 최혜정 · 교신저자 윤연이

소속 (9)
  1. CONNECT-AI Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Ontact Health Inc., Seoul, Korea.
  3. Cardiovascular Center and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
  4. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  5. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. yeonyeeyoon@gmail.com.
  6. Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Brain Korea 21 Project, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  7. Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  8. Cardiovascular Center, Sheikh Khalifa Specialty Hospital, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates.
  9. Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Although various cardiac parameters on echocardiography have clinical importance, their measurement by conventional manual methods is time-consuming and subject to variability. We evaluated the feasibility, accuracy, and predictive value of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated system for echocardiographic analysis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS The AI-based system was developed using a nationwide echocardiographic dataset from five tertiary hospitals, and automatically identified views, then segmented and tracked the left ventricle (LV) and left atrium (LA) to produce volume and strain values. Both conventional manual measurements and AI-based fully automated measurements of the LV ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain, and LA volume index and reservoir strain were performed in 632 patients with STEMI.

RESULTS The AI-based system accurately identified necessary views (overall accuracy, 98.5%) and successfully measured LV and LA volumes and strains in all cases in which conventional methods were applicable. Inter-method analysis showed strong correlations between measurement methods, with Pearson coefficients ranging 0.81-0.92 and intraclass correlation coefficients ranging 0.74-0.90. For the prediction of clinical outcomes (composite of all-cause death, re-hospitalization due to heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia, and recurrent myocardial infarction), AI-derived measurements showed predictive value independent of clinical risk factors, comparable to those from conventional manual measurements.

CONCLUSIONS Our fully automated AI-based approach for LV and LA analysis on echocardiography is feasible and provides accurate measurements, comparable to conventional methods, in patients with STEMI, offering a promising solution for comprehensive echocardiographic analysis, reduced workloads, and improved patient care.

Copyright © 2024. The Korean Society of Cardiology.

Keywords

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningEchocardiography

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1 Correlation and Bland-Altman plots of AI-based automatic and manual measurements of LV and LA parameters. Correlation and concordance between AI-based automatic and manual measurements of LV and LA volume strain values are visualized, with the strength of the association expressed by the PCC. AI = artificial intelligence; LA = left atrium; LARS = left atrial reservoir strain; LAVI = left atrial volume index; LV = left ventricle; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; LVGLS = left ventricular global longitudinal strain; PCC = Pearson correlation coefficient; SD = standard deviation.
Figure 2
Figure 2 SLS according to culprit vessel. AI-based SLS is presented using an 18-segment model. Mean SLS in segments corresponding to the culprit area is reduced compared to that for segments in non-culprit areas. AI = artificial intelligence; LAD = left anterior descending artery; LCX = left circumflex artery; RCA = right coronary artery; SLS = segmental longitudinal strain.
Figure 3
Figure 3 ROC curves for 2-year outcomes. Performance was comparable between AI-based automatic and manual measurements for (A) LVEF, (B) LVGLS, (C) LAVI, and (D) LARS. AI = artificial intelligence; AUC = area under the curve; LARS = left atrial reservoir strain; LAVI = left atrial volume index; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; LVGLS = left ventricular global longitudinal strain; ROC = receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Cumulative event-free survival curves for clinical outcomes. Cumulative event-free survival curves for clinical outcomes are plotted using the optimal cutoff values derived from the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. AI-based automatic and conventional measurements displayed similar patterns in differentiating outcomes. AI = artificial intelligence; LARS = left atrial reservoir strain; LAVI = left atrial volume index; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; LVGLS = left ventricular global longitudinal strain.

그림 출처: PubMed Central 공개 논문 (PMC11569939)

Conflict of interest statement

H.J. Chang holds stock in Ontact Health, Inc. Y. Jang, Y.E. Yoon, J. Jeon, H. Kim, S. Ha, Y. Hong, and S.A. Lee are currently affiliated with Ontact Health, Inc. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article
저널
Korean circulation journal · ISSN 1738-5520
전자 출판
2024-08-26
연구비
Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation 2022000972
참고문헌
29편