SCI 발표논문

SCI 발표논문

← SCI 발표논문 목록

Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(4):917-925.

Current Status and Cardinal Features of Patient Autonomy after Enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act in Korea.

, , , , , , ,

제1저자 김화정, 김유정 · 교신저자 권정혜

소속 (8)
  1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
  3. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Sejong, Korea.
  4. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  5. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  6. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  7. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
  8. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE The main purpose of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act recently enacted in Korea is to respect the patient's self-determination. We aimed to investigate the current status and features of patient self-determination after implementation of the law.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Between February 2018 and January 2019, 54,635 cancer deaths were identified from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database. We analyzed the characteristics of decedents who complied with the law process by self-determination compared with decedents with family determination and with decedents who did not comply with the law process.

RESULTS In multivariable analysis, patients with self-determination were younger, were less likely to live in rural areas, were less likely to belong to the highest income quintile, were less likely to be treated in general hospitals, and were more likely to show a longer time from cancer diagnosis compared with patients with family determination. Compared with patients who did not comply with the law process, patients with self-determination were younger, lived in Seoul or capital area, were less likely to belong to the highest income quintile, were treated in general hospitals, were less likely to have genitourinary or hematologic malignancies, scored higher on the Charlson comorbidity index, and showed a longer time from cancer diagnosis. Patients with self-determination were more likely to use hospice and less likely to use intensive care units (ICUs) at the end-of-life (EOL).

CONCLUSION Decedents with self-determination were more likely to be younger, reside in the Seoul or capital area, show a longer time from cancer diagnosis, and were less likely to belong to the highest income quintile. They utilized hospice more frequently, and received less ICU care at the EOL.

Keywords

Advance directiveDeathNeoplasmsPalliative careWithholding treatment

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest . Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

그 밖의 정보
출판 형태
Journal Article
저널
Cancer research and treatment · eISSN 2005-9256
전자 출판
2021-06-02
MeSH
Aged · Death · Decision Making* · Female · Follow-Up Studies · Humans · Male · Neoplasms / mortality / psychology / therapy · Palliative Care / psychology · Personal Autonomy* · Prognosis · Republic of Korea · Self-Control / psychology · Survival Rate · Terminal Care / legislation & jurisprudence / psychology · Withholding Treatment / ethics / legislation & jurisprudence / statistics & numerical data
연구비
National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency NA19-008
참고문헌
23편